Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 09:40
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Beef cattle disease found in southeast Iowa herd, first time seen in state - weareiowa.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
James Hagens’ Islanders homecoming is no longer just a pipe dream - New York Post
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The Odd Reason Couples Who Argue A Lot Tend To Gain Weight Faster, According To Research - YourTango
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do you think there is growing support for far-right parties in Europe?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What is the boldest and craziest thing your mother has ever done for you?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Higher-Earning Shoppers Hit the Dollar Store as Spending Tightens - WSJ